InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 684
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2004

Re: None

Tuesday, 03/04/2008 10:37:49 AM

Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:37:49 AM

Post# of 432754
My question to NOK is:If you really felt that a license was implied when essentiality of patents was declared to ETSI,why did you sign a 3g license with IDCC with a rate to be determined by a trigger mechanism? Also,why did you feel that it was necessary to include a clause that prohibited IDCC from litigating for infringement for six months (after the 3g license was mutually terminated)if in fact you thought that you were not infringing because of implied consent?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News