Frank, you didn't answer my question....
Were you under the impression that GTEM was working on the 2006/2007 financial restatement from the time after the 2005 restatement was finished and filed?
I think many here were under that impression.
My opinion on WHY GTEM didn't start the 2006/2007 financial restatement work until now (as seemed suggested in the recent PR) is because they probably either owed money to the audit company (Dohan?) from the 2005 restatement and they just got it paid so now it's on to the other audits.....or Dohan (if not Dohan, some other company) requested the money up front for the 2006/2007 audit and GTEM couldn't come up with the money until now.
Admitedlly all conjecture on my part, but these would be good reasons why they didn't start until now.....
I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...present fact to back up your opinion.