Great going? Didn't a critic encourage everyone to call?
Why not call? It is the number they give on their website
to call. Did I give something away, or tip them off?
How would that have been possible? Don't they read this
board and already know that someone from this board
has (claimed to have) gotten an investigation started?
You are correct that it was only someone who identified
himself as David Fairchild. I wouldn't know if that
wasn't his real name. There are David P. Fairchilds
in the real world. He could be one of them.
How do you know the number terminates at a NYC residence?
[Sorry if I missed the post that proved how to determine
this.]
I'm happy to hear about your full confidence that the
DA's office will get to the bottom of this quickly.
My issue is this: the DA's office, and I presume the
OAG (Office of the Attorney General?), will do whatever
is in their power to do (maybe nothing - I don't know),
but they won't tell the public about anything at this
point, so it seems pointless to crow about it and urge
people to call them to verify that an investigation is
on-going.
Claims that it is an election year so that ensures
an outcome that makes for good press are as meaningful
as proof of anything as statements of hope that
in reality FH&AF is legit - they are claims
without substance.
I'm not *defending* FH&AF, I just don't think the
proof offered by the critics will 'hold up in court,'
as what I've seen is basically circumstantial, and
not iron-clad.
