InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

Re: ldogger post# 126988

Saturday, 01/26/2008 1:54:42 PM

Saturday, January 26, 2008 1:54:42 PM

Post# of 245948
When SWVC buys GS AgriFuels ,,,
the 'change in ownership' will alert the 'authorities' ,
and their Green police men, and the toxic site will have
to be cleaned out, before 'operations' can resume.
[ Assuming there ever were any 'operations'. After all,
their Finanshills are NOT Audited. Just guess why Not? ]

It costs a lot of new cash to clean out a toxic tank farm.
Ask anyone who ever owned a gas station in California.
Even the smallest, with 2 tanks, on 1/4 acre, costs over
$300,000 to clean out. And, they even have to clean the
dirt, around + under the storage tanks, and gas pumps.

Just imagine the mess under a bio-fuel processing plant.

And, guess who is a part-owner of that toxic tank farm,
who will be paid off, in cash, from new long SWVC
sharebuyers? And, guess who will pay to clean it all up,
even if it never 'resumes operations'? But, it may be just
as well, because 'operations' were never profitable, anyway.

But, all of this is JIO[AC]O, according to our DD,
which ignores all 'company PR's ' , except to use them
as a source for leads to real + verifiable info.

SWVC is an amazing 'company' , especially for those who
don't only read + repeat + inflate 'company info' .
So far, the only useful real info in the SWVC PR's ,
is the 'timed-release-capsules' of bad news, way after it's
too late to fix, and way after it was 'discovered' that the
old 'hidden' toxic financing was still leaking, and still is.

And, when that quits leaking, there are 4 more, brand new,
toxic CD's, all signed+delivered, but not sealed.

And, worst of all, are those 'creative Preferreds' , and only1
clever guy owns All of them, because he voted for them,
without asking for any other votes. Because, there will
never be any need. They alone are 80% of SWVC. So,
if there were 1 Billion shares of SWVC yesterday, there
could be 4 Billion more, anyday. And, if he uses 1 Billion,
and wants to replace them, to make sure he always 'owns'
more than 50% of SWVC, he can just vote again, any day,
all by himself.

But, SWVC is sure to be profitable, for a while.
But, only for lucky flippers [who may be, or know, insiders],
and almost all of the few shorters, [and the CEO, of course].

And, SWVC is certainly interesting, and educational,
and well worth the time for all, and cost for some,
if they study the facts, even if they fail the final
profitability test. After the pink paper is long gone.

Averaging-down is profitable, for shorters, only.