Friday, January 18, 2008 10:08:23 AM
A R/S would send the wrong message to investors and I just don't see how they can turn things around after that. I would rather that they did a buyback, but then that would mean they would have to actually sell something to make money. Well if they really could turn things around after a R/S, why couldn't they do the same without doing a R/S. That tells me that their plans are to R/S then dilute to raise money for the new plan. Isn't that the same cycle that Frank just did? What new business plans do they have? I have no trust in any company that does a R/S, especially when they haven't even tried to raise money the old fashion way of working for it.
My question is, who would be loyal enough (or maybe dumb enough) to buy back into JMCP after a huge R/S?
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM