InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 708
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/31/2007

Re: msuspartan post# 4254

Thursday, 01/17/2008 11:14:18 AM

Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:14:18 AM

Post# of 27567
I can only speculate, but I would GUESS that it
will be up to the judge, not JPM.
It looks like the JPM issue is that they have a
conflict of interest with PXD, if I'm not wrong
about that ?
That's what confused me, is why they had to change
Trustees to begin with ? Urlich told me that some
'big shareholders" had complained about it.
I shouldn't THINK that would exclude them from
any testimony.
BUT, I'm not a lawyer, have no eyedeer really how
that will wash.
KINGS point is well made with regard to the MAJOR
holders...those fund managers are lossing a BUNDLE
on this NOW...they will want it GONE LONG before
it hits CNBC and ALL of the people who they represent
call them SCEAMING about it !
Their jobs are on the line...to be sure.
catman..ISYA

Vana Catman fondles his mellons...

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.