I can only speculate, but I would GUESS that it
will be up to the judge, not JPM.
It looks like the JPM issue is that they have a
conflict of interest with PXD, if I'm not wrong
about that ?
That's what confused me, is why they had to change
Trustees to begin with ? Urlich told me that some
'big shareholders" had complained about it.
I shouldn't THINK that would exclude them from
any testimony.
BUT, I'm not a lawyer, have no eyedeer really how
that will wash.
KINGS point is well made with regard to the MAJOR
holders...those fund managers are lossing a BUNDLE
on this NOW...they will want it GONE LONG before
it hits CNBC and ALL of the people who they represent
call them SCEAMING about it !
Their jobs are on the line...to be sure.
catman..ISYA
Vana Catman fondles his mellons...
