InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 2416
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: gio post# 197591

Wednesday, 11/21/2007 2:13:56 PM

Wednesday, November 21, 2007 2:13:56 PM

Post# of 433125
If SAM III proceeds, then it would need to be confirmed, so we're talking sometime in 2009.

But the judge started off by saying there is a very high threshold for vacating. The arb panel was not corrupt, so SAM is screwed.

And remember when NTP was suing RIMM? The USPTO was declaring NTP's patents invalid, but the court didn't care. They told RIMM to pay up.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News