InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,080.67
(
-0.26%
)
Post# of 169274
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

oceansorcas

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 365
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/30/2003

oceansorcas

Re: mastaflash post# 154301

Friday, 11/16/2007 7:43:53 PM

Friday, November 16, 2007 7:43:53 PM

Post# of 169274
Wrong again, Masta
The facts are that the SEC gave Rufus from Aug 22, 2006 to Oct. 26, 2006 (8 weeks) to answer their questions/concerns before they filed suit. Did Rufus disclose this informal SEC query to shareholders? Of course not. He did nothing - he didn't respond, hire a lawyer, notify shareholders or anything else. Meanwhile, Sabra Dabbs was in the office nearly every day during this period reassuring shareholders that all was going well! THE SEC FINALLY FILED SUIT BECAUSE RPH TOTALLY BLEW THEM OFF AND THEY HAD NO CHOICE!!!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up