InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 35
Posts 2655
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/16/2006

Re: lazyeye post# 24846

Saturday, 11/03/2007 2:14:54 PM

Saturday, November 03, 2007 2:14:54 PM

Post# of 51429
If it's such a "no-brainer" than how come it seems to have provided months and months of debate?

And furthermore, if keeping the transfer agent "gagged" serves a business purpose (whether or not you can see it) then I would just as soon keep that transfer agent gagged. The ONLY reason to ungag the transfer agent is to appease shareholders who complain about it... UNLESS there is no longer a business reason for it. Then it should be transparent to the shareholders, IMO.

Perhaps your belief that there is such a thing as a "no-brainer" explains it. Personally I don't like handling any of my business or investing decisions without using mine.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.