uncansee; Nice post. But, you also have to understand that the issue of shareholders preceiving edig management as misleading them is not new and it's not limited to just a few malcontents. My own opinion is that they are not liars but I think they do embelish the facts to suit their purpose. They are quick (too quick in a lot of cases) to disperse positive developments and loath to advise of negative ones. Maybe its because they are too close and too sensitive to shareholder's feelings-I don't know. All I know is that they were not forthcoming enough about the EF-10 deal as well as previous ones, for what reason I don't know. You would think by now they would have figured this out and correct it because this strategy keeps coming back to bite them in the posterior. It is very comendable that some posters are prepared to stand firmly behind management regardless of what they do or say but they are many more (me included) who just want to know the facts, good or bad. I can then deal with them as I see fit. We all (well most of us) have a significant stake in this company and all want the same thing. Sure, investing in an OTC stock is risky, no-one disputes that but there is no excuse for investors to be left wondering about the integrity if it's management, whether it is perceived or not. Just MO.
AI
