edit: what about ornary orators of obtuse & opportunistic optimism?
btw, Mr. Golden, these are the same wavoids who objectively presumed that you were/are HhH based solely on a reply to one of your message board posts (elsewhere) which insinuated as much. it would seem that their sharpened pitchforks had enough impact upon you to compel you to meet one of them in the "meat world" to counter the contentions?
btw2, wasn't Agnew also a drug addict?
edit: B-I-N-G-O, not sure how you reached all those conclusions, but i think it is prudent w/any investment (or the consideration thereof) to independently verify claims such as whether the shares are in fact liquid.
following your method, wavoid claims dating back to 1998 or so should result in a current share price of around $1000 or so, yet here it is (well) below $2 -- it was > $3 when it was on the otcbb (in fact was as high as around $20 on otcbb if memory serves).
