InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: Doma post# 30230

Monday, 02/16/2004 1:41:31 PM

Monday, February 16, 2004 1:41:31 PM

Post# of 249114
edit2: 4:39:34 PM ---> 8:30:15 PM

SO, sometime between those hours (on a sunday, mind you), Rachelelise supposedly received "confirmation" of the SEC's approval of the S-3.

& of course, Doma, you (& others) perceive it as a "fact" (b/c it's presumably a positive development for your equity position). nevermind that there is nothing independent to support it (not even a cut & paste of a purported e-mail) & nevermind the fact that *friday's* filings expressly indicate that the registration has not been declared effective (which sorta contradicts Rach's claim that they were declared effective the day before).

this too, is not at all unlike the rumors that Wave/SKS "wrote the TCPA specs" or that Wave "co-chairs a critical TCG subcommittee" which are promulgated by voids again & again until they reach presumed "factual" status & certainly need no independent verification to be purported as "facts" b/c they are possibly positive for wavoids.

& barge it definitely *does* matter b/c people use these unsupported (hyped) contentions as a supposed foundation for SKS' statements that "Wave=the TCG glue" (& i'm not gonna even address yer comment about whether i understand the difference b/tw TCPA & TCG... you should know better by now).

rachel - maybe yer sunday "confirmation" is correct (despite the absence of independent confirmation & public info in direct contradiction) & as you already know, i repeatedly reserved the possibility that my take on the 2% "look back" was not correct.

Doma, you seem to believe that i'm wishing for Wave's demise... as is often the case, you are simply wrong.

edit: awk, that's a pretty impressive figger. one can only wonder if those increases preceded the SEC investigation & are subsequently under water OR if many funds disregarded the investigation & bought it on the cheap?

edit2: hamster... ummmmm, NO.

GKS - yeah, no big deal if SpragueExcess is the enabling technology behind a worldwide MLM scam... he he he.

nice analogy about water & lighters & stuff... that makes sense! LOL.

nawwww, the class action lawyers can't latch on to the relationship b/tw a completely sketchy MLM scam & Wave. no fodder there.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.