InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: ronle post# 30022

Friday, 02/13/2004 1:49:59 PM

Friday, February 13, 2004 1:49:59 PM

Post# of 249131
edit: what if it never hauppens ronle?

that's the point... just look at this re-post by HhH of Snack's SF dinner report of SKS claims. almost none of it has taken place ('cept the PR predicition 8 days later).

SKS claimed a million TPMs per month by now, yet Intel acknowledged last month that there are still only 4M TPM devices in use (nevermind that Doma has rounded it up to 5M on yahoo), which is the same number that existed back in July/August (IBMs using ATML TPMs) which were s'posed to be a BIG market for Wave to sell ETS into & one which Wave s'posedly had a BIG first mover advantage).

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=WAVX&read=411069

SKS also claimed back then that Wave would only need 4-5M to survive for the next year b/c revs would soon equal the cash burn (aka "breakeven"). obviously that hasn't been the case, & in fact, it hasn't even been close to correct.

at some point one has to wonder whether SKS makes these claims knowingly or is he just irrationally exhuberant?!?

Doma, to equate me w/5 Par is voidiotic. i was also accused of being HhH for about a year. such silly suppositions call every single extrapolation you make into serious question. but then again, you have been posting about millions of devices shipped for months & months, yet there is no supportive evidence whatsoever (& Wave just PRed another demo, not a contract, not a big sale, after fifteen years another demo!) FTR, i am not 5 Par (or anyone else currently on yahoo), but his "perfect storm" theory is becoming more & more convincing IMO.

(un)luckytofindwavx, thanks for chiming in to further establish how easily some wavoids will just grasp any straw which seemingly supports their decision to hold this "security" at this time. keep believing i am 5 Par if it makes you feel better.

WAVX has held up somewhat impressively recently (though if IDF was gonna be a big deal, it shoulda been rising on increased volume & instead has just been treading water (slight downtrend last week or so) on incredibly meager volume.

if nothing "literally" "mind-blowing" comes out next week, WAVX will prolly slide down a slippery slope. AND Wave only has until tuesday to get those 4.8 million shares registered in order to a_void the 24% APR "vigorish."

& btw Doma, to answer the question you keep posting on yahoo about why PPers would ever sell $1.90 shares upon registration & get $1.60 (or whatever):

5% better than $1.52... 10% better than $1.44, etc., etc.

ever take a loss, Doma?

edit: i offered "deference" to a private request last weekend b/c the board was getting totally out of control... but as you have posted this in quotes, i s'pose it's time for me to no longer communicate w/that person privately.

& btw, i didn't post again during the weekend as an accomodation to that request.

& btw2, i'm not interested in owning wavx right now (as i've posted repeatedly). too much risk w/the SEC investigation & now almost 10 different class action claimants. if i do end up owning wavx again, it'd presumably be at higher prices b/c of that viewpoint.





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.