lurker1 - I agree regarding the cash dividend. A $0.05 dividend on shares would be a strong signal by the company that they are real and producing.
On the other hand, I have not yet seen the stock dividend (really a 10:1 stock split) yet in my account.
To answer your private message, I am still hedged on my opinion on this company because the dividend did not show up on time in our account. While others are posting that they see the dividend, I have not yet seen it.
To answer your private message - the PPS should rise as anticipation of the buy-out nears. However, there are fairly convincing messages being posted on this board and other boards that really are troubling me.
If the posters are really lying about the character of the company and executives, then these postings and their authors may be subject to prosecution under slander/libel/defamation laws in the State of Delaware and US Federal law.
I am a bit puzzled that AURC would know of these character attacks and put up with the misconduct without warning the people that they are subject to prosecution. More importantly, if they have that much money, they should go out and hire the mouthpieces (i.e. lawyers) to shut the detractors up.
On the other hand, if the detractors are correct, longs could be in risky positions. If their allegations are correct, then the Shareholder meeting may not translate to the buy-out and our shares would be worthless.
I have distinctly noted that the outlandish comments from certain posters here appear to cycle. They post very negative comments when they are out of position and they post more constructive comments when they are in a long position.
I don't believe that my comments have cycled that much as I have held for the long position for many moons. Had I been cycling shares like others here, I would be in a far more profitable situation.
Even after the shareholders meeting, there would need to be a process to "buy-out" the shares and that movement of money would need to occur on a fairly transparent level for iHub readers to get "bought out".
Given the lack of transparency in the last year, one has to wonder if this is even achievable for the company.
On the other hand, L2I's representation has been fairly straightforwards until the gaffe in the last Presser that may have erred on the ex-date vs. record date issue.
AI
