((Based on your analysis of Paivis in numerous posts, Paivis is a scam company with shady dealings, etc and always has been and always will be and that is why TDA and other brokers would restrict the buying))
Wrong yet again. I never said it IS a SCAM company. I have said IMO it is a SHAMMY company. I think their actions and the PPS shows my OPINION to be pretty darned accurate! I did not say that is why brokers R restricting buying. I said Brokers put restrictions on MANY stocks and many of them are shammy and they R not just picking on PAVC. Brokers have a very long list of stocks they have restrictions on.
((...so...with that said, why did TDA, ETRADE, and Scottrade allow opening positions all last year (except for a couple of days after the restricted shares were dumped) up until May 07 and then suddenly, Paivis becomes a questionable company with issues, which just happens to coincide with the 1 year period for the 144 filers?? But, we can still sell our shares back to NITE/TDA, just not buy. ))
I do not know and neither do you! When a broker puts a restriction on a stock it has to go in to effect which means there will be an actual date that it goes in effect. You can cry conspiracy due to the dates they pick, but you are only speculating. IMO, PAVC had waaaaay too many issues and some brokers do what they do with MANY stocks that have issues and a free falling PPS with many promises that never happened. They add restrictions on companies like this, not just on PAVC.
BTW, the restriction DID save people from a massive % decline!!
((However, they will allow their clients to buy so many other non-reporting pinky's as I posted earlier, many of which have done much harsher/more extreme r/s than Paivis/JPHC has in the past and many of which has no reporting revenue, besides printing shares.))
I do not make the rules at any broker. They do. I do disgaree partly. Sure there are plenty of shammy stocks that DONT have restrictions. But to say others have done far worse then pavc is simply your opinion. I look at PAVC and their history and it is quite an ugly picture. IMO, brokers have every right to put restrictions on PAVC based on their past actions. You do realize this is down 99% from it's high? And with all the issues you think it is weird for a broker to put a restriction on PAVC? IMO, the restriction is warranted and once again, the restriction has SAVED PEOPLE FROM INCURRING MASSIVE % LOSSES!
((I don't know why TDA restricts other securities...never owned one or tried to buy one they did restrict, until Paivis. So, I'm not aware of their reasons or non-reasons for other restrictions..but I do not believe their restriction on Paivis has anything to do with TDA suddenly viewing them as a troubled company in May of this year and they are "protecting" their clients. LOL...If that was the case, TDA would restrict 99% of the non-reporting pinkies and many of the OTC reporting companies and to protect their sheep, um, I mean clients, every day...in my opinion, of course.))
First you say you dont know this that and the other but then say you dont think the restriction has anything to do with them protecting customers? Guess what? Call the brokers that have restrictions and They will tell you the reason. They will say there has been suspect activity with the company and/or stock and they put the restriction in to help protect the customers. So you can deny and think what you want, but you cant change the facts or alter the reasons why the brokers are giving. I'll believe the brokers over you if that is OK with you. Brokers have helped save people from huge % losses while you have been talking non stop about how GR8 this company is even as it fell 99%!
((And of course, this will all be a mute point, once the merger/acquisition is completed. But, that's right, Trustcash is now the "dog with fleas" and will be the focus for your rambling, ad nauseam posts.))
And of course this will all be a moot point when merger goes thru and TCHH will be the GR8 new company and will be the focus of your rambling "Greatest company since sliced bread" type posts.
((By the way, how's PHGI doing?? Doing a little comparison DD strictly on the 52wk High vs. Low pps between PAVC and PHGI and PAVC is avg. a little bit better. But your posts are focused on a company(PAVC)that your posts have stated you do not own, and not on the falling pps of the company(PHGI) who’s CEO trolls IHUB, that your posts have stated you do own. Hmmm...wonder why that is??))
Why R U posting about another stock on the PAVC board and insulting another poster? Yea, isn't it interesting though? Look at the board of the stock you mention and you see me all over the CEO for his SHAMMY ACTIONS!!!! Whether I own a stock or not is irrelevant. I call it as I see it and that other stock has it's own issues IMO. However, if you wish to discuss that other stock they have their own board so I do not know why a moderator is posting about a stock that has nothing to do with PAVC on the PAVC board.
In closing - You think PAVC is a GR8 company with a bright future and that is your right. I think it is a sham and that is my right.
So far all indications show that I am correct and you are not. But to be fair, lets wait until the results are in before declaring this a sham or a GR8 company. Down 99% so far. Not looking good, but who knows. You may end up correct and I may end up wrong. So far that is not the case, but the game is not over yet so there is still hope for PAVC to prove itself and start giving gains instead of 99% losses and prove yourself corerct and me wrong.
