SPIN: The clause is what it is. I would construe its words, not the circumstances that might have attended its drafting. I would not impute retroactive accrual.
I am dismayed that somebody put Wave in a position of being judged a non-performer on the basis of inaction by the SEC.
As long as I'm second-guessing these guys, I have to wonder what instrument imposes the obligation to pay liquidated damages after 90 days. I have not seen it anywhere outside the four corners of the registration statement, and I have to question whether such an obligation may be predicated solely on a unilateral declaration in a form S-3. Where's the mutuality?
Best wishes, John
edit: This is the kind of thing I ordinarily would ask the company about. But I'm leaving that to others at this point. At least until somebody makes me a director.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.