InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 361
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2007

Re: None

Friday, 09/28/2007 12:33:19 AM

Friday, September 28, 2007 12:33:19 AM

Post# of 45174
Thanks to all for putting the pressure on!!!!! Good things happen sometimes when XXXXX, YYYYYY, and/or ZZZZZ have NO CHOICES!!!! I enjoyed the ride today.

Question? Why did the PR (27 Sep 2007) on expected oil shipped etc. have Mr. Ellis's name as contact vs. someone else's. I SURE WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THE DECISSION (S) MAKER (S) AT BDGR WOULD HAVE USED A NAME THAT WAS STILL ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY. MR ELLIS HAD PREVIOUSLY RESIGNED. Quote from BDGR press release just after releasing the EXPECTED oil to be shipped, “At a special meeting of the Board of Directors on September 24, 2007, Mr. Ellis, though notified, elected not to participate. The Board discussed terminating Mr. Ellis for cause, but decided to offer Mr. Ellis the opportunity to resign, which apparently he did, without notifying the Company directly, but instead through an unauthorized release.” END QUOTE.

I guess someone does not feel enough PRESSURE to use a BDGR EMPLOYEE/OFFICER/PERSON to release the BDGR information on $s, Barrels, etc. “MORE pressure IS COMING TO TOWN”, BIG TIME - REAL shareholders are on “the WARPATH” and will NOT loose their investment. Some people’s hip boots are not high enough for some of the BS that has been “flowing from Oil City!!!!!! “The old saying goes something like this, “You can run, but you cannot hide“. The shareholders are MAD and it is past time for 100% transparency and 100% direct PR releases, with no gamesmanship in PR wording.

“YOU CAN FOOL PART OF THE PEOPLE, ALL THE TIME
YOU CAN FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE, PART OF THE TIME
BUT
YOU CANNOT FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE, ALL OF THE TIME”

THE LAST LINE IS NOW VERY TRUE MY FRIENDS, WHO JUST MAY BE/COULD BE TRYING TO DO THE LATTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lets play a game: Why was Shares - float used in the PR vs. OS? It may be only about a 20M-share difference and the BS does not explain it on buying back shares for services rendered. A GOOD and ONLY acceptable response and future post/report/PR/audit #s would be: BDGR personnel or anyone that held the delta between OUSTANDING and FLOAT share count gave it back at NO COST WHAT SO EVER TO the BDGR shareholders. AND THERE should NOT BE any quivering about PR wording or anyone being able to indicate that someone is/was-playing games with words.

Just remember Silence is golden, means agreement, and if not disagreed with by BDGR Personnel, it must be a correct post. ANTE UP with ACTIONS, not words.

Have a wonderful evening. I had a GREAT day.