InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 19489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: revlis post# 189931

Sunday, 09/09/2007 11:15:39 AM

Sunday, September 09, 2007 11:15:39 AM

Post# of 433125
IDCC would then be in violation of the NDA clause in their PLA by referring to a license for a product that does not exist, thereby revealing Apples future Business Plan..!


P.S. Study the extensive Qualcomm vs. Texas Instruments Litigations, triggered when T.I. in a conference call slipped and said they pay Q zero royalty in their PLA!

I now know one more thing. "certain future mobile phones" are "future iphones" which means 3G. I do not know why the 8-K did not say so. I suspect too many hands in composing the 8-K.

mschere

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News