Super Hero Justice League Team America.

[stockasaurus rex]

answer to 4godnwv. With all due respect, there is ample proof that she has comitted a felony both at the state level and at the federal level. claiming ignorance of the law is NOT a defense. remember merely offering a PDR for sale in this country is ILLEGAL at this time. Frankly, its sad that MT would put her in the position, but the law has bee broken and the law is the law and now she must be brought to justice



Posted by: 4Godnwv
In reply to: overachiever who wrote msg# 87392 Date:8/20/2007 10:32:43 PM
Post #of 87436

While I respect the right to gather DD in any manner one chooses, I must note that you have previously stated that DD gathered from boards such as this one are worthless, and now you are stating that calling the company is equally worthless.

The issues you present have all been argued from several points on this board.

1. audited financials were coming in March

There are several valid points made here, among which were the wording of that particular PR:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=17278589

Note that the phrases "off shore companies", "This audit will confirm the amounts PANAMERSA Corporation holds in the bank", and "All 2006 numbers derived offshore will be certified with financial institutions in Latin America".

While the argument has never been settled and everyone is entitled to their on opinion, using terms like "spread false information", "come clean", and "con games" may not be appropriate when describing Theresa's involvement.

It may simply be a case of an employee of the company repeating what they have been told is factual. One might in fact, be ignoring the best chance of uncovering fraud here, if one believed there was any.

2. A Pirate Theme Park was being built

I have seen no evidence that that project has been scrapped. In fact, the last information I received was that property was being looked at in several locations.

3. You could get your money by wire from selling PDRs at the PDR exchange within two weeks.

The original intent was that wire transfers would be possible. Subsequent investigation found that it would violate Panamanian laws regarding the foundation. While no one is happy about that development, little can be done to rectify it. Another option must be, and imo, will be found.

Who is to blame, and what consequences should they suffer? While we can discuss those points, I fail to see how accusing Theresa benefits anyone. My assumption would be that she had nothing to do with either the offer or the retraction. A decision to accuse her, put on on trial without allowing her to defend herself, find her guilty without even speaking with her, and passing judgement that she is guilty seems presumptous to me.