As far as I know, all the SEC cares about is correct financials. The SEC may have brought out issues that had to be resolved and maybe the only way Globetel could do that was to show the old auditors what the SEC brought into question and ask them how things might be changed in order to satisfy the SEC's desire to see correct financials.
If true, then going to the old auditors would not be an SEC requirement, if true then that would be Globetel scrambling around trying to fix something. In other words, if true, then that would be an excuse for not doing things correctly the first time.
I think that is probably Bleckman's message; 'more problems from the old regime'.
