yes, while some may make arguments for or against Globetel based on unverifiable information from Globetel, those who post that they have sources they can't talk about yet these sources are purported to have made statements that appear calibrated (read fabricated) to affect whatever topic happens to be being discussed at any given time, are not credible by the very same standard that the poster would apply to attack (or support) the Globetel information. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
We need verifiable information from any source, be it positive, negative or from the company itself.
