InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: None

Saturday, 01/17/2004 3:53:42 PM

Saturday, January 17, 2004 3:53:42 PM

Post# of 62920
more dubious typoBET claims!

now you purport that Nielson has gone short against the box w/the 10M option shares & have the abject temerity to claim that Barry couldn't know this to be a fact sans "inside info"?!? anyone who isn't incredulous in the face of the lies you post must have had a full frontal lobotomy.

there are no filings whatsoever to indicate that Nielson has disposed of any option shares (or the underlying interest thereto), just your specious allegations. they also only currently exist as treasury shares & would necessarily require Nielson's exercise in order to SAB them, which of course would require a form 4 filing AND registration of the underlying shares.

you also falsely claimed, "it would seem that everyone accepts that they were evicted." only those who seek to unlawfully drive down the pps "accept" this premise & only insofar as it serves that agenda. Gwinner's "going dark" observations are the most likely scenario (assuming for arguendo that there was some rent default, an issue that has certainly not been supported by anything beyond "anonymous" message board posts). any "eviction" would necessarily require a forcible entry & detainer action. not surprisingly, there is no evidence whatsoever that any such claim exists. if there was one, you & yer determined minions would assuredly have a link to post, yes?

moreover, HYTT released the statement that they had secured a $10M M&A LOC facility during this same time frame. so to "accept" your flimsy premise would require one to assume that the lending entity either disregarded the purported "evictions" in their DD, or failed to discover them (though RB posters are ostensibly privy to these material facts). either scenario seems wholly unlikely.

NittanyLion completely dismantled your BS claims about another CD coming in April '04. additionally, as i understand Reg D, the earliest that HYTT would even qualify under the once per 12 month rule is Oct. 8, 2004, in that the prior (non-toxic) CD was still open until Oct. 7, 2003. it is entirely unlikely that by that time HYTT will even need that sort of access to capital.

by then, HYTT will have completed the acquisition of at least three cash-flow positive U.S. entities & will likely be profitable on not just an ebitda, but also on an NOI basis.

i'm gathering all of your fraudulent posts & forwarding them to enforcement@sec.gov.

give my regards to Aziz Ibrahim (aka) "Anthony" Elgindy.



By: HPOBET
17 Jan 2004, 02:34 PM EST Msg. 5130 of 5130
(This msg. is a reply to 5128 by barryinla.)
Jump to msg. #  Go

" He has not sold one single share. Period.

You would have to have insider's knowledge to know this as a fact.

Actually there are ways - not all of them necessarily legal absent full disclosure - that people can effectively sell their shares even if they really are effectively only lending the shares out and replacing them at much lower prices just as one for instance.




Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COWI News