InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 95
Posts 15292
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2001

Re: Gbathat post# 18783

Friday, 07/20/2007 11:03:52 PM

Friday, July 20, 2007 11:03:52 PM

Post# of 88726
Gbathat I would challenge it based on the company's own projections. Apparently they do not intend to let it compound but will keep the working capital at lower maybe somewhat fixed amount. Their projections for SWARM revenues by 2010 to only be $14.7 million We expect SWARM to generate at least $14.7 million in revenue for calendar 2010 with negligible drawdown. This is a projection, but considering minimal risk to capital and our revolutionary trading technology, proprietary trading becomes an integral part of Spooz business and will serve as a demonstration of our ground-breaking initiatives.”
http://www.spooz.com/press_details.aspx?ContentID=97


So although wild theoretical projections might be possible it does not sound like that is their intention. And we should not project such possibilities into possible share PPS dollars.

Just using their own conservative projections should suffice for excitement while not overstating potential that would lead to disappointment and crazing and unwarranted PPS volatility.

Getting in at these prices - I am pumped about the future here.

LOL however that does not mean an individual using the technology could not approach your estimates...ohhh!

ThSeeker


It is easy to figure out what you believe. The difficulty lies in determining - is what you believe the truth.