InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,730.16
(
-0.14%
)
US TECH 100
19,405.20
(
-0.33%
)
Dow Jones
42,156.11
(
-0.37%
)
Brent Oil
71.86
(
0.21%
)
Bitcoin
63,380.58
(
-3.42%
)
Post# of 157300
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

oneeyedjacs

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 49
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/26/2005

oneeyedjacs

Re: coastiretired post# 81661

Friday, 07/20/2007 2:40:59 PM

Friday, July 20, 2007 2:40:59 PM

Post# of 157300
Coasti, true as true can be. But amid the speculation in both camps, let's pay attention to the facts:

Gtem has filed a lawsuit.

Trimax has not filed a lawsuit.

Would a practicing attorney risk sanctions for a frivolous suit? Not sure. But I do know that the plaintiff needs to clearly state the damages and refer to the specific contravention in the contract. It must have basic merit or it will be quickly dismissed.

Uli has only threatened to sue. And has made what appear to be demands that GTEM will not or can not meet.

If Uli is without fault, he has no need to countersue. He will win and be awarded appropriate relief. IMO
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up