![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, July 20, 2007 3:45:59 AM
I can definitively state, I along with many others are very much excluded from your "we" in, at this point, extremely misleading, matter of fact statement. 'We' are not waiting on any such thing... on the contrary 'we' are waiting for massive PPS increase.
Otherwise, please do expound further... these allegations categorically are mere speculation on your part without some sort of evidence to back up such seemingly erroneous claims. IF they are true however as you so confidently post, MANY eagerly await some verifiable SOMETHING that would make you state this.
This leads me to other relevant questions concerning your claims:
1. Why would a 'certified dead stock' take care of back tax issues to go belly up 3 months later? Or issue PRs a month before?
2. Please list from your supposed "observations" any other flatlined and dead stocks that the risk meter did not apply to and what exactly the risk meter reading DID DO in these situations...
Preferably along with verifiable evidence of what led you to this "observation". Otherwise any unverifiable "observation", be it mine or yours, is delusional at best.
I have an equally unverfiable observation of why SMMW is not pulling up anymore on the risk meter... could it be there is a symbol change coming? Move to a bigger board? To put it as someone else does frequently on this board - EHHHH, WHO KNOWS?
3. AGAIN, do you have the SEC evidence of this "certified dead stock"? I personally along with MANY others, very very very much would like to see any documentation IF IT EXISTS.
And if not, again speculation on your part. Look forward to see what evidence you have to put this misleading argument to rest.
I frequently post SMMW .05+, usually followed by an IMO. And anyone with half a brain can clearly see this stock hasn't traded at .05+ in the past three years and then can clearly deduce this is a statement of opinion on where the price is going.
However, many post muddled misleading opinions as if it is truth with NO FACTS to back up their claims - and you ESPECIALLY as a moderator, 'due respect' or not, need to quit blatantly misleading the board with your subtle and sometimes not so subtle spin - which to this point has been clearly YOUR opinion and needs to be stated as so from now on. I trust as a moderator you will also make sure others comply as well.
Oh and BTW, certified dead stocks don't trade $6600 in $vol. on the day someone claims they're dead. And this IS verifiable- that there was volume.
FEATURED North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM
HealthLynked Expands Telemedicine Nationwide • HLYK • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM