Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:31:43 AM
I can't see it as an obligation imposed by the taxman. That would be very unusual, as companies constantly write off stuff they deem not worth pursuing. But if BMG were trying to claim the amount through an insurance policy, then I could see the insurance company insisting that all avenues first be explored.
The insurance company won't have to bear the cost of the litigation, so it is no skin of its back if BMG loses (they still will at most pay the original claim). But the taxman would only end up having a bigger expense being written off, as the litigation costs are also claimable as an expense.
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Announces 2024 Clover Work Plans & Nevada Portfolio Updates • ELMGF • Sep 10, 2024 11:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Inc. Completes Major Step on Uplist Journey by Closing Strategic All-Stock Acquisition of CarryoutSupplies.com • NGTF • Sep 10, 2024 8:15 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • ELEM • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM