InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 504
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/10/2006

Re: KQforever post# 79788

Friday, 07/13/2007 3:23:27 PM

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:23:27 PM

Post# of 114954
ok, last post about this:

I stand by every of my previous posts.
Whether the contract is oral/verbal or not does not really matter. I heard it was only a verbal contract. I still believe that. The mail you got today does not deny or confirm that...but again: that is not the point.

The point is that the content of the contract is like this: PNMS would pay 240K USD/month to desimplex. This should have started in march/april.
At this point in time, not a single payment(except 10K) was received by desimplex, thereby already missing out on about 1 million dollar. The mail confirms this. If it is not clear from the mail from desimplex, contact them again to get a clearer answer.

Secondly, PNMS stated that is HAS OBTAINED 20%. This is not true. If they would fulfill their side of the contact, they would be on a path to obtaining it. This is also confirmed in the mail.

Finally: the mail is a polite response to a question from a shareholder. But you can imagine that they are really pissed at desimplex since they're waiting for their money thay long...
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.