InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 169
Next 10
Followers 105
Posts 10437
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 07/08/2006

Re: lytnup post# 87

Friday, 06/15/2007 12:05:16 AM

Friday, June 15, 2007 12:05:16 AM

Post# of 169
Depends on how the case works out.

"Typically, indemnification is not available to those who intentionally cause injury."

So, if it can be proved that they were diluting for personal gains, while intentially causing injury to the company stock with no regard to shareholders, it would not be that difficult I would assume.

Now, I have seen when stock promoters were forced by a judge to buy back stock on the open market. Stockster had to do that for MUME last fall "Though it was a PK stock and diluting the hell out of it, so it made no difference."

Now, IMHO, I don't see how the new management would be responsible for the old management selling there Restricted and now Cancelled shares.

Still waiting on a couple pieces to that puzzle though!

-Spec



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.