InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,494.64
(
-0.50%
)
US TECH 100
18,789.60
(
-0.28%
)
Dow Jones
40,485.60
(
-0.87%
)
Brent Oil
80.20
(
-1.61%
)
Bitcoin
64,113.95
(
-0.75%
)
Post# of 249315
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

TonyMcFadden

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 40
Posts 5588
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 11/23/2002

TonyMcFadden

Member Level

Re: SPIN post# 23795

Saturday, 12/20/2003 8:21:02 PM

Saturday, December 20, 2003 8:21:02 PM

Post# of 249315
The problem I have with your argument SPIN is the PP is past tense, shares were already authorized in the last SHM, the proceeds have been collected. The S-3 allows those participants in the PP to sell their shares.

Although it's certainly a source of annoyance for the PP participants if the S-3 is delayed.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. - Carl Sagan

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up