you musta missed the summary 24:
redacted it as i have no desire to "pile on" to an already dismal affair, but others viewed it. sorry you missed out, but it was a rather detailed run-down of certain events, statements, etc. over the years that perhaps a disinterested & objective party might construe as circumstances having the potential to cast an appearance of impropriety.
don't own wavx or any related calls, puts, etc., SO, i have no financial interest whatsoever in how this plays out & wouldn't dare even consider taking any such interest until (if) Wave is exonerated.
