DeSormeau's letter claims he wasn't paid for expenses and work performed for three years. IF this is true, all the ledger entries for Business Works prior to its date must be fraudulent right? They couldn't represent compensation if he's complaining he wasn't paid and threatened to take the issue public. Maybe there's other possibilities like they represent kickbacks.
I don't know whether or not that letter's content is true. It doesn't make sense to me why the TA cut so many certs instead of issuing one or a couple to cover this debt. Info in his correspondence and the TA's ledger don't add up.
----- "We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful." -- Warren Buffett
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.