InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 6172
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2007

Re: rvd post# 33858

Thursday, 05/03/2007 4:04:08 PM

Thursday, May 03, 2007 4:04:08 PM

Post# of 81575
Yes it is up to the Examiner

to make the determination. Now we're getting somewhere. As yet, they have not assigned an examiner for CHDT's trademark application.

When they do, the examiner is guided by the Trademark Manual of Examination Procedures (TMEP). I redirect you to my original link, Chapter 1200 of that manual:

http://tess2.uspto.gov/tmdb/tmep/1200.htm#_T120303

1203.03(e) False Suggestion of a Connection

Section 2(a) prohibits the registration of a mark that consists of or comprises matter that may falsely suggest a connection with persons, institutions, beliefs or national symbols. See TMEP §1203.03(a) regarding persons, TMEP §1203.03(b) regarding national symbols, and TMEP §1203.03 for information about the legislative history of §2(a).

To establish that a proposed mark falsely suggest a connection with a person or an institution, it must be shown that: (1) the mark is the same as, or a close approximation of, the name or identity of a person or institution; (2) the mark would be recognized as such, in that it points uniquely and unmistakably to that person or institution; (3) the person or institution named by the mark is not connected with the activities performed by applicant under the mark; and (4) the fame or reputation of the person or institution is such that, when the mark is used with the applicant's goods or services, a connection with the person or institution would be presumed. In re White, 73 USPQ2d 1713 (TTAB 2004); In re Nuclear Research Corp., 16 USPQ2d 1316, 1317 (TTAB 1990); Buffett v. Chi-Chi's, Inc., 226 USPQ 428, 429 (TTAB 1985); In re Cotter & Co., 228 USPQ 202, 204 (TTAB 1985).