InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1280
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/22/2003

Re: Snackman post# 143470

Sunday, 04/29/2007 1:47:49 PM

Sunday, April 29, 2007 1:47:49 PM

Post# of 249161
I don't know you.

I also didn't say you were a pawn. I did say-infer might be better- you were being used to relay a message from Wave to the board. Why no contact to all the shareholders that Steven was available? This message came through you Larry. I am not faulting you in any way. I just think that if the company was truly concerned they would have reached out further than just through the message boards that's all. There could very well be a whole segment of investors that have no inkling of what is going on until the proxy drops in their laps. This is not meant with any disrespect, but as a mixed message. You say shareholders were concerned and asked you to call. Why not politely decline and have them each make contact-obvously they were open to this. Why take it upon yourself to inform SKS about the uproar over this issue, and not let the chips fall where they may. Lastly why reveal you had a conversation with SKS and that it changed your mind-why not state your mind was changed and let it be? I just think this options issue and the lack of response to the shareholders is going to do a disservice to the company going forward.

Dave

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.