Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:22:31 PM
got this from otc...something to read.
Excerpt From December 7 Edition of the Closing Bell, By Adam Olensis
Given that the US economy is growing at about 4½ times the rate of the Japanese economy over the past 9 years, it would be difficult to imagine that the apparent correlations in the Nikkei and Nasdaq are anything but episodic and anecdotal.
Now, one other interesting point may be made about the difference between the way the US economy is responding in its post-bubble era and the way the Japanese economy has responded. Basically the US government has begged, borrowed, and bought this 3.4% growth, leveraging its capacity to stimulate the economy by lowering taxes, by massively lowering interest rates, by electronically "printing" money, by borrowing money from bond buyers, and by spending oodles more than it collects in tax revenue (growing the deficit). It's a little a little bit like the way Cisco (CSCO) used to buy its growth by acquiring small companies and writing off the acquisitions in that the government has assumed debt, pumped the proceeds into the economy and called it growth, extracting the money from the "debt pocket" and putting into the "GDP pocket."
Of course the big question is whether this leveraging of debt is a zero-sum game, a less-than zero-sum game, or an effective counter-cyclical strategy that will smooth the amplitude and widen the frequency of the business cycle, and ultimately make the US economy a more valuable going concern (less cyclicality in any "asset" makes it more valuable).
Whatever the correct answer is to the tripartite question above, it will look different than do the Japanese economy and the Nikkei. Either the counter-cyclical stimuli will work or they won't. But the results will almost certainly be patently different from what happened in Japan, and consequently the relative progressions of the stock markets are most likely to look quite different. In fact, I would suggest, the LEAST likely scenario would be for the US markets to trace out paths similar to the one traced out by the Japanese market. Our demographics are different (US population is growing where the Japanese population stagnated), we have vastly more immigration, our country's racial makeup is quickly transforming itself, and the two countries' histories just prior to their bubbles were markedly different (Japan was a newly minted, post-WWII juggernaut overlaid onto a culture that still bore the earmarks of a feudal society, forced onto the launching pad by foreign (US) stimulus after the war.) Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, the current aggressive countercyclical stimuli proffered by Greenspan et al are explicitly designed to AVOID just the fate that befell Japan.
So, what should we provisionally conclude? The Greenspan Gambit is working in the short run. We do not yet know whether it will work in the long run. If it is going to work, then the US economy will grow itself out from under the giant debt load assumed to counteract the post-bubble stagnation. If it is not going to work, we probably won't know that for some time. Which is to say that the stimuli in the system still have some more room/time to play themselves through. And (in the "failure" scenario) the current strong growth path in the economy will then turn down...but down with an even larger debt load on its back, which will accelerate its decline to an even lower low. (Just like stocks, larger return implies higher beta.)
Bottom Line: In my opinion this market will tend to work itself higher as earnings and the economic statistics continue to reflect the effects of stimuli in the system. And it will probably be mid-to-late '04 before we start getting clear on whether the economy has been on a stimulus-induced high from which it will crash like a crack addict, or whether it has ingested a healthier kind of "nutritional support" that has helped it to heal itself.
President Bush's re-election hopes are very likely to hinge on just this issue. So we can bet that the pedal will be to the stimulus metal into at least 3Q04..
In my opinion, this piece of work is brilliant, and I had to share it with you.
The market is now grinding sideways. It is estimated $3 to $5 billion in stock sales are hitting the market everyday to meet mutual fund redemptions as investors flee from their corrupt mutual funds. This spells opportunity for those on the long side.
Excerpt From December 7 Edition of the Closing Bell, By Adam Olensis
Given that the US economy is growing at about 4½ times the rate of the Japanese economy over the past 9 years, it would be difficult to imagine that the apparent correlations in the Nikkei and Nasdaq are anything but episodic and anecdotal.
Now, one other interesting point may be made about the difference between the way the US economy is responding in its post-bubble era and the way the Japanese economy has responded. Basically the US government has begged, borrowed, and bought this 3.4% growth, leveraging its capacity to stimulate the economy by lowering taxes, by massively lowering interest rates, by electronically "printing" money, by borrowing money from bond buyers, and by spending oodles more than it collects in tax revenue (growing the deficit). It's a little a little bit like the way Cisco (CSCO) used to buy its growth by acquiring small companies and writing off the acquisitions in that the government has assumed debt, pumped the proceeds into the economy and called it growth, extracting the money from the "debt pocket" and putting into the "GDP pocket."
Of course the big question is whether this leveraging of debt is a zero-sum game, a less-than zero-sum game, or an effective counter-cyclical strategy that will smooth the amplitude and widen the frequency of the business cycle, and ultimately make the US economy a more valuable going concern (less cyclicality in any "asset" makes it more valuable).
Whatever the correct answer is to the tripartite question above, it will look different than do the Japanese economy and the Nikkei. Either the counter-cyclical stimuli will work or they won't. But the results will almost certainly be patently different from what happened in Japan, and consequently the relative progressions of the stock markets are most likely to look quite different. In fact, I would suggest, the LEAST likely scenario would be for the US markets to trace out paths similar to the one traced out by the Japanese market. Our demographics are different (US population is growing where the Japanese population stagnated), we have vastly more immigration, our country's racial makeup is quickly transforming itself, and the two countries' histories just prior to their bubbles were markedly different (Japan was a newly minted, post-WWII juggernaut overlaid onto a culture that still bore the earmarks of a feudal society, forced onto the launching pad by foreign (US) stimulus after the war.) Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, the current aggressive countercyclical stimuli proffered by Greenspan et al are explicitly designed to AVOID just the fate that befell Japan.
So, what should we provisionally conclude? The Greenspan Gambit is working in the short run. We do not yet know whether it will work in the long run. If it is going to work, then the US economy will grow itself out from under the giant debt load assumed to counteract the post-bubble stagnation. If it is not going to work, we probably won't know that for some time. Which is to say that the stimuli in the system still have some more room/time to play themselves through. And (in the "failure" scenario) the current strong growth path in the economy will then turn down...but down with an even larger debt load on its back, which will accelerate its decline to an even lower low. (Just like stocks, larger return implies higher beta.)
Bottom Line: In my opinion this market will tend to work itself higher as earnings and the economic statistics continue to reflect the effects of stimuli in the system. And it will probably be mid-to-late '04 before we start getting clear on whether the economy has been on a stimulus-induced high from which it will crash like a crack addict, or whether it has ingested a healthier kind of "nutritional support" that has helped it to heal itself.
President Bush's re-election hopes are very likely to hinge on just this issue. So we can bet that the pedal will be to the stimulus metal into at least 3Q04..
In my opinion, this piece of work is brilliant, and I had to share it with you.
The market is now grinding sideways. It is estimated $3 to $5 billion in stock sales are hitting the market everyday to meet mutual fund redemptions as investors flee from their corrupt mutual funds. This spells opportunity for those on the long side.
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.