InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: paige post# 19581

Thursday, 04/26/2007 3:59:36 PM

Thursday, April 26, 2007 3:59:36 PM

Post# of 45771
Paige is this PR referring to the same contract as the other PR which states that it was a sub-contract?


ROCKVILLE, Md.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 3, 2002

CDEX Inc. (CDEX), a Nevada Corporation, announced award of a contract to perform additional testing of its proprietary mobile explosive detection system, EM-1, under the auspices of the

United States Department of the Army's Communications and Electronics Command, Electronic Sensors and Night Vision Laboratory.



I think if this contract was directly with the Army it would clearly state the fact in the PR. It would read, "announced the award of a contract with the United States Army's...."

What PR writer worth his salt would not make that absolutely clear?

Instead, it states that they're under the auspices of the US Army and it is obvious that if they're testing on US Army proving grounds that would definitely be the case.

The expertease of Classical MalSpeak.

Now, where is the contact number and the contracting officer's name and number?

Again, I will make the call.


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.