InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 585
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2003

Re: bbigtim post# 142691

Tuesday, 04/24/2007 4:49:05 PM

Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:49:05 PM

Post# of 249461
Bigtim, If I may butt in: I gave a shortened version previously of my call with Steven. He made the same points he made with Ramsey re: historical reference points. My understanding was that the 1.5-2 M issued per year was not split adjusted. On the other hand, the float was smaller initially (he mentioned 20's), then up to near 40M (similar to today's #) which was part of the rational for the increase to the same levels. Does this mean that the folks receiving options going forwards sidestep the effects of the reverse split? I would say yes, clearly. I don't see anything wrong with that, personally. It just confirms what we already know. For buy and hold Wave longs (and I am in that category) Wave has been a terrible investment thus far. On the other hand, if one felt the company was successfully re-invented and was willing to purchase very cheap shares (60-80 cents, pre-split) it wasn't very expensive to increase one's position (I also fall into that category).

And yes, Tampa, that is all my private information, but in the context of the board's discussion, I don't agree that it is inappropriate. Personally, I'm finished with this discussion. Best of luck to all longs!
Svenm
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.