InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 646
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2003

Re: Snackman post# 142430

Tuesday, 04/24/2007 12:27:54 AM

Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:27:54 AM

Post# of 249244
Snackman- I know you said "I am finished" and I understand, but I hope you will respond one more time. It seems that SKS is outright lying to us! It appears to me that Wave knew exactly what they were doing and are now treating us like nincompoops with that garbage about the change time, the lawyers, and costs.
per SKS:
Wave thought they were going back to the same percentage they had back before the split. They did not even give the 500,000 a second thought, because that what it was before the split.

Wasn't the 500,000 option grant reduced to 166,666 by the reverse split. Now, if Wave pushes the grant back up to 500k without a coinciding forward split the option opportunity for any individual(s) has been tripled. This affects us directly by a corresponding dilution of our interest in Wave. I do not think that any shareholder would vote for that. If my understanding is correct, then SKS's statement above and then the conjured up justification has changed my mind and my votes to NO. Please answer whether my understanding is correct about the option grant numbers. By the way, I suppose that the situation has been covered adnauseam, but I am behind the curve here.

If you can't, perhaps someone else will help me out.

thanks, hnstabe

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.