InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 4885
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/18/2003

Re: Wildman262 post# 142449

Monday, 04/23/2007 10:59:44 PM

Monday, April 23, 2007 10:59:44 PM

Post# of 249374
Hi Wildman

Guess we ought to have that CC before the proxies are sent in.

I'll listen to Scorpio now about the dangers of voting no. I don't give a hoot about the cost. I do care how this ERROR was allowed to happen. I do care about the reputation of the company....Will it gain or lose respect on the street if there's an SH rebellion over option compensation. (If it's positive then it's worth the cost in PR and marketing alone.) If it's negative (there go the crazy wavoids again it could seriously damage the share price.) We need a new hire to oversee Quality control and Math.

The real problem here, as always, is the lack of accuracy of management time and number projections. When I first asked, Why Now? I figured it might be something like this. Well, That's been answered.

My question now is Can SKS come up with a plan to meet this reaction and turn it into a positive?

I'd urge us all to give all the smart folks here time to turn this into a win-win. The screaming should stop and some good can come out of all this angst. Let's see if Trust can be really built by actions on all sides.

Right now, I can see myself voting either way depending on the words and actions of management. Let's all take a deep breath.


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.