InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,615.35
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,804.00
(
0.64%
)
Dow Jones
40,000.90
(
0.62%
)
Brent Oil
84.58
(
-0.02%
)
Bitcoin
61,552.80
(
1.27%
)
Post# of 249238
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

nomad1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 45
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/04/2005

nomad1

Re: scorpio_esq post# 142420

Monday, 04/23/2007 9:24:03 PM

Monday, April 23, 2007 9:24:03 PM

Post# of 249238
I don't believe it serves the interests of the shareholders. I also believe it perpetuates the perception that Management really is out for themselves, whether true or not. And without clear, specific direct need to be addressed by this action, such as the reverse split needs to occur to keep us on NASDAQ, then the only reasonable response should be, either come up with a reasonable rational common sense need for the action, and get your YES vote, or go pound salt, as my Dad used to say.

Nomad
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up