InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,615.35
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,804.00
(
0.64%
)
Dow Jones
40,000.90
(
0.62%
)
Brent Oil
84.57
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
58,528.94
(
1.10%
)
Post# of 249238
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

rwk

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 1500
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/06/2003

rwk

Re: rachelelise post# 141629

Thursday, 04/19/2007 12:30:42 PM

Thursday, April 19, 2007 12:30:42 PM

Post# of 249238
rachelelise

I agree that "Speculating on motives is fair but hardly sufficient to prove need".That's why I termed it my "interpretation" and "rationalization" only. Given history, I probably have less than a 1% probability of being right!

But a "good explanation for the large increase" would be an anticipation of a large increase in the number of new hires. Note that the options are intended to be granted over an expanded 7 year period. Not a short term grab for value in my mind.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up