InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,904.72
(
0.58%
)
US TECH 100
20,071.60
(
1.05%
)
Dow Jones
43,477.84
(
0.08%
)
Brent Oil
72.88
(
3.07%
)
Bitcoin
91,590.85
(
1.92%
)
Post# of 157300
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

db_ill_invest

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2005

db_ill_invest

Re: griff100 post# 71695

Friday, 04/13/2007 4:27:58 PM

Friday, April 13, 2007 4:27:58 PM

Post# of 157300
I'm not a lawyer, but I believe you are incorrect that everyone is included. these two posts below explain my reasoning. I think the deductable has already been met by legal fees, so the lawsuit is irrelevant for all practical purposes going forward. I do think the people that started it were successful already with it for their purposes. IMO.
The lower post has a link to the Supreme Court decision.

FWIW: It wouldn't surprise me, like Vern stated, for the insurance company to cut their losses and negotiate a settlement with the remaining plaintiffs.



http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13992262

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=11388883
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up