Um, Frizzell posted on a public forum and appeared multiple times in chatrooms. Other attorneys have done the same. Many politicians are attorneys. Like everyone else, they have first amendment rights and are entitled to express their opinions.
Get a clue. No one here has an obligation to provide proof on anything for free. If you want info, pay for it otherwise be grateful when someone shares out of kindness.
As for Urbie and other insiders, I think leaving them untouched will harpoon the lawsuit. Seriously. Edwards and Desormeau can claim they performed services as contracted and have no idea what Urbie (or another insider) did w/ the accounting system, financial records, or funds raised. They could also claim their contracts were for completely different services and weren't aware what the public was being told in PRs. If Urbie is called as a witness, he'll probably plead the fifth. What is the judge and/or jury to think? Will the company be able to produce corporate records to support its side? Probably not.
-----
"We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful."
-- Warren Buffett
