InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,240.03
(
1.04%
)
US TECH 100
17,444.00
(
0.17%
)
Dow Jones
38,997.66
(
0.76%
)
Brent Oil
76.02
(
-1.48%
)
Bitcoin
56,494.24
(
4.64%
)
Post# of 358440
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

matrix

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 30
Posts 4021
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2004

matrix

Re: jarta post# 229915

Friday, 03/30/2007 10:06:52 PM

Friday, March 30, 2007 10:06:52 PM

Post# of 358440
Okay, thanks. I've shared the same concerns since back then too. Yeah, Jarndyce v. Jarndyce seems to fit. lol

I don't see how Frizzell was working completely independent of all shareholders unless he planned to be named as plaintiff himself in the lawsuit he warned would be filed this week on shareholders' behalf. http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=18264669


It appears he keeps assuming the company was a victim and not a willing participant. I doubt that's the case. If the company (which is now the named plaintiff) had any role in illegal activities claimed, wouldn't the judge throw out the recently filed lawsuit??


-----
"We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful."
-- Warren Buffett

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up