Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:18:50 PM
For example if I were an investor I would ask , why no production from the existing reactor to date? A little research would tell you that no serious utility would enter into a contract without proof of an uninterupted supply and bulk sampling. For example IESV had to undergo 30 days of uninterupted testing before entering into a supply contract and the source was from bulk samples (not a couple drips).
I think the biggest red flag here is that other than a few drips the "reactor" is idle. Have any of you ever invented anything or brought a product to market? I can tell you from experience that the inventor would never let that reactor sit idle even if he had to give the product away.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM