InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,728.80
(
0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,542.28
(
0.97%
)
Dow Jones
42,052.19
(
0.69%
)
Brent Oil
72.91
(
-1.49%
)
Bitcoin
69,270.27
(
-1.34%
)
Post# of 495952
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

teapeebubbles

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 212
Posts 319403
Boards Moderated 11
Alias Born 12/01/2002

teapeebubbles

Re: teapeebubbles post# 255339

Thursday, 03/22/2007 3:40:52 PM

Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:40:52 PM

Post# of 495952
the Post seems to approach the issue with a certain unstated assumption: that Rove and Miers will not tell the truth. I guess the White House’s reputation has reached this point.

Second, if one of the principal problems in this scandal is the fact that administration officials have been lying about what transpired, why is it unreasonable to ask witnesses to be sworn in? What is it about “So help me God” that causes so much grief?

And third, since perjury is a more serious crime than lying to Congress, wouldn’t swearing the witnesses in help ensure that lawmakers will get the truth?

#board-2412


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act, but a habit." - Aristotle

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up