Go, I suspect that you're an intense guy...
On this topic, I am VERY intense. Yes, I have a financial stake in trusted computing by virtue of my WAVX investment. But trusted computing is BIGGER than Wave. (Folks don't wanna hear that, I know.) It's ONE "layer" of the multi-layered security approach that every smart security person sees as necessary. But if they don't know the layer exists, is readily available, and is just waiting to be used, that's a problem.
The thing that gets lost in the back-and-forth froth-and-bile-fest with various of the bashers is this: You can hate Wave and still realize that trusted computing is important and necessary. I would argue that it is INCREASINGLY **vital** when you weigh the risks.
I told this to a friend recently: I don't want to be the guy who THOUGHT about trusted computing right up until the time there was a major cyber-security incident in this country. (And if you scoff at the possibility of this happening, you are CLUELESS.) I want to be the guy who MADE SOME NOISE ABOUT IT.
Best Regards,
c m
