Is this one of those "it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is" kinds of deals?
If you wish to interpret it that 'in conjunction with' does not mean on the same premises, then you obviously may, but that does not make an interpretation that they were there necessarily wrong.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.