Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[SPIN]

edit: i'm not @ all embarassed!

i would think a lawyer employed in the public trust would not be so eager to defend corporate moves that harm s/hs.

i would think a lawyer employed in the public trust would be very offended by the less than forthright communications coming from HQ & would speak up against some things that are arguably malfeasance or at minimum are entirely reckless.

e.g., do you think it was right for PJS to remark in the 3/31/03 CC that "literally a few weeks" a "series" of PRs? sprague should be embarrassed! do you support the fact that Feeney never paid back his forgiven loan & dumped wavx into the INTC spike @ $5.

i don't consider what i've stated as "backpedaling" @ all... Wave holds 4.5 million shares of SSPX +/-

SSPX recently had a break-out that included substantial (record) volume. Wave coluld have certainly unloaded millions of shares @ higher than it is now (knowing that they needed the $)

they sold around 200K shares.

you defend their decision to print more shares & seek to dismiss my observations.

that's fine, but it says mucho about your posture.

24, why didn't Feeney pay back the "forgiven" loan (a loan that if issued today would violate Sarbannes-Oxley & was done just before the law went into effect).

should Gerry Feeney be embarrassed for not paying back his loan when the company desperately needs operating capital?

nahhhh, float s'more stock & cut s'more bonuses & deal out s'more options... using rubber stamped renewals of the 1994 plan!

yep... sounds fair & appropriate.

edit:

rather dishonest to edit your post 24 & not designate it as such... tsk! tsk!