InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[F6]

loop -- I'll go with what Merritt said was his view re the sealed docs (the transcript of the cc says Fagan made those statements, but they sounded like Merritt to me), which of course is easy for me to do since he stated the same view I've had all along -- that there is NOTHING in the sealed docs that has ANY impact on IDCC's correct assertion that the Ericsson/Sony-Ericcson licenses are the trigger for NOK's, and thus Samsung's, TDMA-based 2-2.5G license obligations; and accordingly that there is NOTHING in the sealed docs that has ANY impact on IDCC's claims/position in either the NOK arbitration or the likely Samsung arbitration

(this post is also my response to your other recent posts re the sealed docs and NOK/Samsung)