Nemesis18
Re: kabunushi post# 706255
Monday, July 15, 2024 5:48:34 PM
Post#
706260
of 707496
Why not contact the MHRA's CEO's Office direct then, to find out yourself ?
Or are you afraid to venture outside of this forum to seek answers ?
Go on, take that security blanket off , created by the echo chamber here....
Executive.Office@mhra.gov.uk
The MHRA's CEO's direct email is
June.raine@mhra.gov.uk
Or if you prefer, you can address any questions to:
clintrialhelpline@mhra.gov.uk
And if your feeling particularly brave, why not contact the Chair of the CHM ?..
p.mulholland@ucl.ac.uk
Tuesday, July 16, 2024 1:56:15 AM
Post#
706323
of 707497
And if your feeling particularly brave, why not contact the Chair of the CHM ?..
p.mulholland@ucl.ac.uk
You know that it was Paul Mullholland who presented the DCVax-L P3 data results at New York Academy of Sciences in about an hour long presentation on May 20, 2023, right?
My guess is that no, you didn’t.
sentiment_stocks
Followers 230
Posts 14768
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/29/2014
sentiment_stocks
Member Level
Re: Smitty5150 post# 707246
Saturday, July 20, 2024 12:42:31 PM
Post#
707253
of 707498
Something seems certainly off in what Nemesis is claiming regarding some sort of hold up. But as I've stated over and over, as sure as you are receiving information from the MHRA that there is no external investigation, I, too, am QUITE sure that what Nemesis states regarding his diagnosis, and his GBM treatment, is what he says it is. What doesn't quite make sense is his insistence that Kings wanted to put him in the DCVax trial. What possibly happened is that perhaps at some time prior to surgery, Kings suggested that if it was found that he did have GBM, he could enter the trial. But certainly after the surgery, when it was obvious there was no tumor (just a few cells) to make a vaccine with, they'd have had to tell him he wasn't eligible for the trial. But even with a small presence of GBM (in the biopsy), they opted to move forward with SOC, which didn't require any tumor present to do so.
It's also possible that the timing of everything that happened during that initial diagnosis and surgery was for him a bit of a blur, as all of that stress leading into this could have made him mix up the times. But his medical records would likely reflect the accurate timeline as to how things unfolded. Perhaps whomever he's been in contact with have already investigated and found there not to be any issue. He has indicated he'll be accepting of that outcome.
AI
